Saturday, 21 April 2012

My image so far


Here is my image for the reinterpretation of my review. I was inspired by the original Loveless artwork, as seen here:


But in order to correspond with my 'vision' of the album, I tried to enforce more of a feeling of the album being a dreamworld, so I merged the original photograph I took with another image I have taken of clouds. The original shots I took for editing when creating this image were this:

(Yes, I'm left handed!) and the following, which is the image that ended up being the one in my final piece;

I felt the image already shared a few of the same qualities that were brought to my attention through Loveless' artwork. For me, it was important to signify the blurring of sound, the ambiguity and indistinguishability. I feel that the image turned out pretty well, definitely capturing some of the same emotions I would get from reading rhe piece.

EDIT: Bugger, far too small for the Sideways Looks website.

Wednesday, 18 April 2012

Works in progress: Kezzia



Works in progress: Eilish

Here are some closeups of Eilish's painting. I really love the blend of colours in the sky and the sand;


Works in progress: Debbie


Works in progress: Steve



These are work in progress shots of Steve's drawing. Considering he claims he can't draw, I was very impressed! Neither of us can read music, so we are awaiting laughter from those who can, but it's very much a metaphorical representation of music progressing from quietness to loudness, as far as I understand it.

Tuesday, 17 April 2012

Creation

Tonight, I have been really pressing on with getting everyone's contributions submitted for website formatting. Everyone's had their colouring pencils, paints and Google on standby. It's a bit of a shame that my brother, Josh, didn't have the time to contribute a piece of his own. He's been on standby for much needed web coding advice though.

Monday, 16 April 2012

Review


Here is the final draft of my review of the website;

Two decades since their latest release in 1991, shoegaze pioneers My Bloody Valentine have finally decided to stun fans and release a remastered reissue collection containing their Creation Records back catalogue – with an EP collection, 1988’s full-length debut ‘Isn’t Anything’ and, most notably, their breakthrough album Loveless. This set has been in the making since 2004, and after years of setbacks and delays, is finally hitting shelves on 7th May.
Since forming in Dublin in 1984, My Bloody Valentine have endured a number of image, sound and line-up changes. The band started off as a gloomy, gothic Birthday Party homage, fronted by ex-vocalist Dave Conway. Soon after, bassist Bilinda Butcher joined the band, Conway left, and the Valentines signed for Alan McGee’s Creation, drastically changing their sound from the aforementioned whimsical fuzz-punk to the blissed out, tremolo arm-bending sound the band are critically acclaimed for creating today – exemplified in their 1991 masterpiece Loveless.
Frontman Kevin Shields, when approached about what it is Loveless is attempting to achieve, often urges listeners to disregard what it is about popular music that draws them to it – whether it’s lyrics, vocal strength, typical song structures or anything else, and appreciate Loveless for what it is – a sonic soundscape, like an orchestra decked out with Fender Jazzmaster guitars documenting a dream sequence. But the album does not become lethargic, despite all of this. There are moments that grab the listener by the throat and force them onto the dancefloor all the same.
Opening with ‘Only Shallow,’ in which the guitars see-saw their way in and out of focus before settling down into clean, jangly strums and Butcher’s sleepily hazy vocals, Loveless relies heavily on this idea of blending textures, layers of soaring guitars and making instrumentation and voice indistinguishable, which it does to great effect.
Follow up ‘Loomer’ assumes the same sort of recipe; overdriven guitars in the foreground, layered in textural guitars in behind – which gives their aesthetically simple pop songs a dynamism that hasn’t been replicated since. Sure, bands have tried, with Americans Fleeting Joys’ 2006 album Despondent Transponder being branded as nothing more than a pastiche by some, but the gulf in song-writing quality, stemming from Shields’ rumoured Brian Wilson style perfectionism (Shields was declared clinically insane at one stage, and the album took two years in the studio to record, costing at least £300,000 of Creation’s funds to produce, almost bankrupting the label) is plain to see.
‘Loomer’ brings the pace of the hard-hitting opener down to a steady, yet guitar-laden lullaby. The thing with Loveless is that none of the songs are overbearingly ‘heavy,’ per se. The songs just almost use the layers of guitar to blanket the listener, making for the more upbeat songs like ‘Only Shallow’ quite a claustrophobic feeling, with nowhere to escape. The densest of songs coming in the form of ‘Touched,’ which is a short keyboard driven instrumental piece bridging ‘Loomer’ with album high point ‘To Here Knows When,’ that could almost accompany a 1950s silent cowboy film. Cinematic in one of the truest senses of the word, you have to hear it to believe it.
‘To Here Knows When,’ arguably one of the album’s defining moments, pitches Butcher’s soft vocals soaring over the gentle roar of Shields’ guitar, characteristically bending in and out of key, backed with a beat that wouldn’t be out of place in a Happy Mondays song. Before launching into ‘When You Sleep,’ which slaps the listener back into focus, there is one of a number of codas placed between each song, which helps to set Loveless apart from most of its peers. The one following ‘To Here Knows When’ is similar in atmosphere and feeling to ‘Touched,’ which really, in truth, serves as not much more than an extended coda itself.
Off the top of my head, it is difficult to really think of any other rock albums from the early 90s that try to redefine sound and structure in music in a similar way to how Loveless does. There is always talk of genre-defining records; Nirvana’s Nevermind defining grunge, The Beatles defining pop music, Elvis Presley with rock ‘n’ roll, The Stone Roses synonymous with Madchester and so forth; My Bloody Valentine sound nothing alike their ‘shoegaze’ peers – bands such as Ride, Lush, Chapterhouse – but Loveless is still regarded as the sound of the genre ‘that celebrates itself.’ Something that the band themselves weren’t too keen on.
Following on from ‘To Here Knows When,’ the album starts to take more of a grip on traditional rock music. Enter ‘When You Sleep.’ Don’t get me wrong, all of the My Bloody Valentine traits are there; Shields’ indistinguishable vocals blending with the music, the recognisable drum machine that adds to Loveless’ charm, but this time there is more of a verse/chorus/verse style dynamic. Well, not really a ‘chorus.’ More of an instrumental break­­­­­. But the thought is there.
‘When You Sleep’ ends in a crescendo of energy, culminating in yet another coda, shimmering its way into ‘I Only Said’ like the sun ducking into the ocean’s horizon. The next song maintains the energy that its predecessor musters up; the guitars bending in and out of pitch more so than ever, again creating that feeling of being blanketed by the guitars, as they blend and once again, use the same verse/instrumental break/verse structure introduced in ‘When You Sleep.’ ‘Come In Alone’ follows this surge in energy, keeping steady but hitting hard, maintaining the dissonance and swooping guitars that make the band who they are.
‘Sometimes,’ featured in Sofia Copolla’s 2003 film Lost in Translation, breaks the mould that the preceding tracks have built up; an acoustic song drowned in thick, warm feedback, defining the very heartbeat of the album, complimented by Shields’ hushed vocals. The song builds up to a climax that ends with a driving keyboard accompaniment that really sums up the diversity the album has to offer.
Culminating in ‘Soon,’ via ‘Blown a Wish’ – the album at its most airy and shimmering, and ‘What You Want’ crashing its way like waves against the shore, highlighted by more synthesized lead melodies, the album builds into what is arguably the highest point of the band’s entire output, let alone this album. Enter ‘Soon,’ a seven minute dance inspired track with a hip hop drum sample. The song starts off with guitar feedback lingering, its ghostly trails leading into a slick drum sample, before the rest of the instruments kick in. The bass line bounces chirpily before Shields’ ethereal guitar shrieks and squallers, layering the song with that signature MBV sound without detracting from its edgy and unique dance floor filling capabilities. Perfection.
The album is often accused of a high degree of studio trickery, and whilst the band strongly denies there is anything in the rumours, it’s no wonder that the average listener would make the mistake. Loveless does not sound like a cheap production by any means. It is the sound of an unstable perfectionist on the cusp of a breakdown, entranced and determined to achieve this elaborate musical vision, no matter the cost. Like Brian Wilson and Syd Barratt before him, Shields provides all of the elusiveness and mystique needed to be deemed an eccentric and reclusive genius; but Loveless definitely proves that Shields knew best.

Saturday, 14 April 2012

Hans Belting

One of the key points from talking to Michelle was Hans Belting and his book 'An Anthropology of Images: Picture, Medium, Body.' - Michelle thought some of his ideas were inkeeping with my plans, and as it turns out, his theories could be key in defining what it is I'm trying to achieve. Michelle pointed out two passages in particular that were of great help;

Human perception has repeatedly accommodated itself to new pictorial technologies, but in keeping with its nature it transcends such medial boundaries.
Like perception, images too are inherently intermedial. They transcend the various historical media that are invented for them, pitching their tent in one new medium after another and then moving on to the next. It would be a mistake to confuse the image with these media. For a medium is but an archive of dead images until we animate the images with our gaze.
And the last phrase is the key one. Music reviews don't come 'alive' until the reader takes all of the imagery and creates a vision of it. When I began this project, my original idea stemmed around the idea of cutting out the middle man, so to speak, and aiming straight for that vision. But of course, there are complications; the vision will then be reanimated in its own right, with the cycle never ending.

Belting goes on to discuss how we "conceal a photograph's existence as thought we wanted to make them immaterial images dwelling in our imagination." That's what my project is; a construction of these visual images and an analysis of the response.

Monday, 9 April 2012

Redrafting

Ok, so now my project will consist of a 'gallery' format rather than being a mocked up news site. I have struggled all throughout this project with my approach, and now, after meeting with Michelle and talking over my ideas and where to go with them, I have decided to do a sort of case study of my family and see how different perspectives play a role on how we interpret creative writing. Music itself is known for being open to different interpretations, but when it comes to writing a review, the process is very similar. I am going to write a review - and I have a few records in mind - and I will have my own sources for inspiration in how I want to frame the album in question, which will be dissected and re-interpreted much in the same way the music itself is once I've written the review.

I've started looking in to writings by Hans Belting, as well as Nigel Holmes, Peter Wiebel and Bruno Latour, Komar and Melamid. Michelle's input has helped greatly. We discussed giving each subject a set of strange rules to undertake when approaching their pieces, but since the majority of my subjects don't recognise themselves as 'artists,' this may not be the best route to take.